2001 Capping Pilot Study

Project Details

  • Capping was performed July 9, 2001 through October 19, 2001.
  • Capping was performed over a 750- foot stretch of the lower Grasse River located approximately 1 mile downstream of the Arconic (formerly Alcoa) facility discharge (Outfall 001).
  • The different types of capping materials included (alone or in combination):
    • 1:1 sand/topsoil mixture;
    • granulated bentonite (clay) material; and
    • AquaBlokTM material (a solid aggregate covered in clay).
  • The different placement techniques included (alone or in combination):
    • surface and subsurface placement via mechanical clamshell;
    • subsurface placement via tremie pumping; and
    • surface placement via pneumatic broadcasting (bentonite only)

Alcoa Inc. - Massena West Facility

Massena West Facility
  • Placement of cap materials was monitored by using both conventional survey methods and a sophisticated WinOps positioning system that utilizes the Global Positioning System (GPS).
  • Capping was performed in two phases: an initial "Test Cell" was used to test the potential cap materials and placement techniques. The real-time results from the Test Cell were evaluated and select capping techniques and cap materials were carried forward in the "Pilot Cells" for testing on a larger scale.
  • During capping activities, an in-river silt curtain containment system was used around the perimeter of the cell being capped.
  • An extensive monitoring program was conducted prior to, throughout, and after the capping pilot study work. Water quality, cap thickness and PCB concentrations, benthic organisms, and other parameters were monitored.

Summary of Results

Studying the River

Results of the pilot study indicate that a cap to cover the PCB-containing sediments can be successfully constructed in the lower Grasse River. Testing of several application methods and capping materials found that optimal results were achieved with a 1:1 sand/topsoil capping material applied - at the water surface or subsurface - via a clamshell bucket attached to a barge-mounted crane. This combination was capable of generating a cap:

  1. With good uniformity and thickness;
  2. With no significant PCB entrainment from the in-place sediments (cap materials remained clean during placement);
  3. No significant resuspension of in-place sediments; and
  4. with no significant separation of the sand/topsoil mixture during placement.

The Capping Pilot Study was carried out with little apparent short-term impacts on the environment. Water quality impacts during capping were negligible. Nearshore aquatic vegetation areas were left undisturbed, and on-shore land disturbance (for the staging area) was minimal since a prior staging area was utilized. Monitoring of the cap area was also conducted in 2002 and 2003 to collect additional information related to the physical, chemical and biological conditions in the cap following placement. The 2002 data indicated that the cap remained in tact and was functioning as designed. A summary of these monitoring results can be found in Public Presentations. The 2003 data indicated that the cap and some of the underlying sediments were disturbed by what was later determined to be an ice jam related scour event. A series of investigations were conducted to evaluate the impact of the ice jam on the sediments, water column, and fish of the lower Grasse River and to evaluate possible options for preventing future ice jam related events. The results of these investigations are provided in the document titled Addendum to the Comprehensive Characterization of the Lower Grasse River which is currently being finalized. An overview of ice management options under evaluation can be found at Ice Management Evaluation.